Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the director of the C Apartment Management Office in Gangnam-gu, Seoul from April 2013, and there was conflict with the occupant of the apartment in relation to the conversion of apartment management affairs from autonomous management to outsourcing services.
On December 1, 2014, at around 10:00, the Defendant agreed to convert apartment management to external services from the above C Apartment Management Office, the Defendant expressed to the victim D with three occupying residents, including E, that “I do not wn any wn at low-income women, because I do not have any wn, wn, and B do not do so.”
In addition, the defendant, around 10:00 on February 7, 2015, at the above C Apartment Management Office, the defendant said that the victim D et al.’s five occupants, including E, “it is not wraped, and it is less than that, for a year with no difficulty or difficulty.”
Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, the victim can be acknowledged as having withdrawn the complaint against the defendant on June 15, 2015, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act