1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts written or added in the following cases. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

[Supplementary or added parts] The 9th 9, 18th 99 and 18th 18th m "F of the first instance trial and the trial witness F of the trial," and the 18th m "B 2 through 14th mar" shall be written with the evidence of "B 1 through B 14, and 17."

Then, the 10th page “not participating in the instant project” added to Defendant MFCA, Dae Line, and Sjin did not raise any objection against the termination of the successive contract due to the termination of the contract for Defendant KB KW, and the Plaintiff himself re-subcontracted the entire subcontracted construction to SPC, and did not directly perform construction work.

The first 10th 10 and the first 11th "only with the facts recognized in the preceding" shall be added to "only the facts recognized in the preceding and the statements in Gap evidence 10,19,20."

2. If so, the decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.