logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.12.12 2014나51061
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modifications or additions, thereby citing this case as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

(a)in the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the 16th, the 19, 21th, the 4th 2, 5, 7, and 11th, the 5th 8, and the 9th 9th , “Defendant Republic of Korea” shall be applied to “Defendant”;

B. In the first instance judgment, “the Defendant” shall be replaced by “the co-defendants of the first instance court,” and “the Defendant shall have the obligation to implement the registration procedures for cancellation of the ownership transfer registration of this case, and the Defendant B farming association shall have the obligation to implement the registration procedures for cancellation of the ownership transfer of this case” shall be replaced by “the co-defendants of the second instance court,” and “the co-defendants of the third instance court,” which shall be filled by the following:

(c) in the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “B 1 to 9” shall be added to the phrase “B 1 to 4, B 1 to 5-1, 2, and B 6 to 11.”

The following shall be added after the nineth day of the judgment of the first instance.

According to the statements or images of Eul's evidence 1, 4, and Eul's evidence 5-1, 2, 8, 10, and 11 of Eul's evidence 5-1, 8, 10, and 11, most of the instant land were discussed, but most of them were discussed, and it is recognized that buildings owned by the joint defendant B of the first instance trial were constructed in the vicinity of the said land, and that the parking lot was created on the said land after the construction thereof."

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow