1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the part concerning the conjunctive claim against the Defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) such part is cited in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

[Supplementary Use] The part in which Defendant D Co., Ltd. and Defendant Co., Ltd. are referred to as “D”, “Defendant C” as “C”, and “Defendant B” as “Defendant.”

A. The third 6 criminal statements referred to in the 6 criminal statements " October 4, 2005" shall be deemed to be " October 14, 2005."

A. The 6th 11th 12th 12th 12th 12th 2th 10

A. [Supplementary ] At the end of 6th seven pages, the witness L, the husband of C, made a statement to the effect that he/she knows that he/she has lent his/her shareholder name to the deceased as well as the Defendant C in this court.” In addition, “No. 24 evidence, No. 53, 54, 64, and 66 evidence” is added to “No. 24 evidence, No. 57, No. 54, 666” at the 6th 8th 7th 21st 21st 21, it is not deemed that the status of the shareholder of C and the Defendant is completely identical, and I and J’s relationship with the deceased, and J invested and lent money to the deceased, and the Plaintiff and D paid KRW 1.6 million each month from February 2, 2006 to December 12, 2012. Therefore, it is difficult to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s claim to dismiss the Plaintiff’s shares under the name of the deceased.”