logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.09 2019나2032628
진료거부 및 의료과실 손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial revision as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 15 to 16 of the 2nd 15-16 Fair Trade Commission did not know the fact that “I must remove aluminium leaves,” and “I would like to not explain that I would have to remove aluminium leaves,” and “I would like to find “I would like to know that I would like to know that I would have been wrong for correction treatment on April 2013,” and “I would like to give additional correction treatment to I would like to see that I would have 15 years after the expiration of 15 years,” and “I would like to remove 5 years’ extinctive prescription before removal of 10 years’ extinctive prescription” instead of “I would have to remove 5 years’ extinctive prescription before removal of 10 years’ extinctive prescription.”

arrow