A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall knowingly receive any divulged personal information for profit or for any other wrongful purpose.

The Defendant was engaged in the loan brokerage business with the trade name (State) D in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On November 2012, the Defendant received the personal information of the credit card company customers from E by receiving approximately KRW 280,00 information (name, resident number, mobile phone number, address, workplace name, etc.) from the credit card company customers for the purpose of loan brokerage, etc., even though he knows that E was illegally collected personal information at the main points in the transactional distress of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “SP”) around 1, 2012, from around three times in total, including the receipt of personal information of the credit card company customers from E for the purpose of loan brokerage, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the suspect examination protocol of prosecution E;

1. The applicable legal provisions of subparagraph 6 of Article 71 and Article 28-2 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. concerning criminal facts, the selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, where the personal information of a customer managed and kept by a credit card company for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is illegally leaked, not only infringement of personal rights and interests arising from the divulgence of personal information regardless of his/her will, but also infringement of personal rights and interests arising therefrom, but also the leakage of personal information, in itself, there is a need for strict punishment because the citizen's trust in the safety of information and communications network has been substantially damaged and the increase in social costs for recovery has become a serious social issue. The crime of this case is that the personal information provided by the defendant as the personal information that the defendant received 5.4