Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered the waiting room for the second floor cleaning staff of the D basin located in Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, for the purpose of taking away from E and F, who is a social service personnel; (b) taken off the face of the above E in drinking; and (c) brought the face to be continuously taken on drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted social service personnel performing the subway history safety management duties, thereby hindering the legitimate performance of duties of social service personnel.

2. The Defendant, at around 23:40 on August 6, 2017, arrested a flagrant offender on suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties at the places specified in paragraph (1) and was transferred to the Japanese Western Police Station type of the Seosan District, Seoyang-gu, U.S., Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, U.S., and was on duty, during the investigation atmosphere, G belonging to the said police station, the police officer F, and H, who was on duty, during the investigation atmosphere, and in the light of the police officer G, and the police officer H, who was on duty, “I do not have any fluor, fluor, bit of bitch, bitch, fluor.”

Nytha, Nytha, Lytha, Lytha

The expression of “”, etc. publicly insulting G and H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F (including the E Statement);

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and G;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (inter alia, between the crimes of interference with the performance of official duties and the crimes of insult);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize all the crimes of this case and reflects their mistakes, the first offender who has no particular record of criminal punishment up to now, the agreement with some victims, and the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, and motive for the crime.