logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고정1800
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the believers of the B church “Emergency Countermeasure Committee” (hereinafter “Non-Subrogation”), and the victim C is the believers of the same church’s “D organization” (hereinafter “D”).

In order to slander the victim, who is the representative director of the Switzerland, in the situation where there is a serious conflict between non-Subrogation and D's succession to the integrity of the B church and the legitimate exercise of the right of possession, the defendant openly damaged the reputation of the victim by posting the following false contents:

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant did not have directed the victim to compensate for money using BEO or to take advantage of the contact, on October 17, 2012, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by posting a notice to the effect that “When considering the social status of the CEO, it is a wrong prescription that the direction of the victim to take advantage of the contact with the victim is a wrong prescription, even if the prescription was wrong.”

2. The Defendant, despite the fact that the victim, who is the members of the B church, was not specially related to the church finance, destroyed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts. The Defendant, on November 7, 2012, posted a notice to the effect that “RE: RE” is “I, after having access to the said carbook at the above Defendant’s home, she does not have any monetary relationship with the H president.” However, the Defendant’s reputation was damaged by publicly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow