The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who served as a dental sanitarian at the E dental hospital operated by the victim D in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

No person shall conceal any false fact openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame any person, and damage the reputation of any third person.

The defendant's purpose is to slander the victim on the ground that he/she was forced to resign from the victim of the above hospital on September 2015 because he/she was forced to resign from the police officer on the ground that he/she was forced to resign from his/her office, and that the victim was not in violation of the Medical Service Act, despite the fact that he/she was forced to resign from his/her office, and that the victim did not violate the Medical Service Act, on September 22, 2015, around 15:19, by using the computer at his/her own residence located in Songpa-gu Seoul F apartment 9 Dong 507, the president "E" as the title "D."

A person who led the president to leave his or her dismissal, and dump him or her to leave for himself or herself together with three employees, with a large amount of sound to have his or her employees, and to have him or her retire by a cruel method.

G Staff member’s non-qualification certificate

He had observed that the head of that Sari village had the day of the medical clinic and directly engaged in the oral care in the medical clinic.

The phrase “E accusation” shall be written and published on September 29, 2015, by re-connectioning the Internet homepage of the said hospital at the same place as on September 29, 2015, using a computer, and making and posting a letter to the same effect as “E accusation” in the online counseling column, and by linking the same day with “H” Republic of Korea (H) by using a computer at the same place as at around 13:22 on the same day, and by linking the same day with “H” Republic of Korea on the general bulletin board.

The author prepared and posted a letter to the same effect as “,” thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts through an information and communications network.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are to promote the use of information and communications networks.