logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.06 2015고단760
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 300,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On June 6, 2014, at around 20:00, the Defendant found the victim D’s main points in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Seoul underground, in a state of 'E’ operated by the victim D, and was subject to criminal punishment on the grounds that the victim was subject to criminal punishment by reporting the Defendant, the Defendant took a bath, such as “A fine of one million won has been made by making a report by Nice,” and the victim took a bath, i.e., “C., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main role operation by force.

B. On November 201, 2014, at around 01:40, the Defendant ordered the victim H, who is the owner of the above main shop in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to provide alcohol, but the victim said that “the business was terminated”, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to the victim, such as “Ple, the same year as the bit of bitch, and the same bitch bitch,” and (b) obstructed the entrance by blocking the passage of other customers; and (c) 30 minutes, such as interfering with the passage of other customers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

2. On January 10, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the disturbance of cancellation of government office) was found in the state of 104 persons of war from Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and the Criminal Service and Office of the Incheon Samsan Police Station, and the police officers working in the place of the situation “responing to prison due to the collapse, went to prison, and resolved the fine in today’s prison, and asked the chief of police station to hold an interview with him.”

Therefore, even though police officers returned home to the defendant, and later returned home to the defendant, and later returned home over several occasions, the defendant, in disregarding of this, she was able to take a bath for about 15 minutes while she took a bath for police officers.

Accordingly, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance at a government office while under the influence of alcohol.

3. The defendant is at the same time and place as paragraph (2).

arrow