Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, at the Daegu District Court on December 5, 2014, violated the duty of prohibition on driving under the influence of alcohol on at least two occasions upon receiving a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime from the vice branch branch of the Daegu District Court on December 17, 2014, and KRW 3 million for the same offense.

On February 25, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.156% in blood without obtaining a driver's license of a motor vehicle on February 16, 2017, and driven a DNA cargo vehicle on the section of about 80 meters in the section of 80 meters from the private distance near Tol in the Yongnam-gu of the permanent city to the permanent Tolle in the same city.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, Defendant B: (a) at the time, at the time, the alcohol content of at least one half of Mauritius was difficult for Defendant B to drive normally while drinking not less than 0.05% of alcohol; (b) despite the knowledge that the driver’s license was revoked and that the driver’s license was non-licenseed, Defendant B, upon A’s request, had A drive the said Pour vehicle.

As above, the Defendant: (a) caused A to drive the vehicle without a driver’s license; (b) caused A to drive the vehicle without a driver’s license; and (c) her to easily drive the vehicle without a driver’s license; and (d) her to drive the vehicle without a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Arrest report of a criminal suspect who violates road traffic laws;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving alcohol;

1. The driver's license ledger (A);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (A), and Acts and subordinate statutes (verification of criminal history of the same kind and reporting attached to summary orders);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol).