The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is a situation that can be considered favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, the fact that there was no significant damage from the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim K Hospital.

However, the crime of this case was committed in consideration of the defendant's theft of the victim E's credit card and attempted to drink food by the credit card payment error, and the nature of the crime was not that of theft of cash by entering the center of the victim K Hospital at night. The defendant had a record of criminal punishment several times due to larceny, and even during the probation period due to night structure intrusion theft, the defendant committed the crime of this case in addition to the crime of this case in consideration of the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, and family environment, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.