The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects the wrongness of the defendant, that the victim was not punished by the victim by agreement with the victims, and that the amount of damage to the crime of this case is not high, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the instant crime committed committed on May 24, 2014, which was sentenced on May 2, 2012 by the Defendant on three occasions in school classes, children’s houses, etc., and was committed on May 24, 2014, which was sentenced on May 24, 2012 by the Defendant on three years and six months after the execution of the instant punishment was completed, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and home environment, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.