1. The Defendant’s KRW 22,159,950 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from December 8, 2012 to September 9, 2015.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: Hanam-si Urban Development Project (An urban development zone of zone No. 2): Defendant: B of April 29, 2011, Gyeonggi-do public notice C of the Hanam-si on April 25, 201, and C of the same Si public notice on May 10, 2012;

(b) The Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on October 9, 2012 - subject to expropriation: E-do 329 square meters, F-Do 12 square meters, G 51 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”): The starting date of expropriation: December 7, 2012 - Compensation for losses - Totaling KRW 818,600,500 - An appraisal corporation and an appraisal corporation;

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 20, 2013 - Contents of the ruling: Increase the amount of compensation for losses to the Plaintiff to KRW 836,04,050; - An appraisal corporation dialogue between appraisal corporations, a stock company, a new appraisal corporation in the future of a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”) (hereinafter referred to as “adjudication appraiser”), and the result of appraisal thereof “the result of appraisal”)

D. The result of the appraisal commission to appraiser H of this Court (hereinafter referred to as the "court appraiser", and the result of the appraisal commission to him is referred to as "the result of the court appraisal"): 858,204,00 won (the land of this case shall be assessed as the site, road, and answer according to each category of land, but since part of the land of this case is being used as a parking lot according to its current status, it is based on the plaintiff's assertion that the value of each land of this case should be assessed as 870,470,70 won) - The fact that there is no dispute as the ground for recognition - Gap's statement, Gap's 1,3,8,10 evidence, Eul's evidence, Eul's evidence (including each number), the result of appraisal commission to appraiser H, the whole purport of the argument entrustment, the whole purport of the pleading entrustment.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is used as a parking lot on the current status of F. F. 12 square meters and G. G. 51 square meters, part of the instant land, and thus, the compensation for the instant land is based on the said current status.