1. The Defendant is 5% per annum from June 10, 2016 to August 22, 2017 with respect to the Plaintiff as well as 2,703,247,976.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: C project name (Ij): The defendant: D public notice of Gyeonggi-do on April 2, 2010, E publicly notice of the king on April 9, 2013, G public notice of Gyeonggi-do on March 28, 2012, and G public notice of Gyeonggi-do on April 10, 2014;

(b) Adjudication on expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on April 25, 2016 - Attached Form owned by the plaintiff

1. Land listed in the table (hereinafter referred to as "each land in this case"; hereinafter referred to as "each land in this case; hereinafter referred to as "per parcel number") and 11 parcels and obstacles - Date of expropriation: June 9, 2016: Compensation for losses for each land in this case: Total amount of KRW 3,217,46,460 - An appraisal corporation: Vice Governor of the appraisal corporation among the appraisal corporations in the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation and the Gyeonggi-Nam Vice Governor of the Korea Land Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "appraisal of expropriation");

C. The result of the instant court’s entrustment to appraiser H on November 28, 2016 - Contents of appraisal: A sum of compensation for each of the instant lands as KRW 3,310,934,112 (a sum of compensation for losses on each of the instant lands shall be assessed as KRW 3,310,934,112 (a sum of the current status shall be assessed as a site only for the area of 209.08 square meters among the I land, and the remainder

D. The result of the court’s entrustment to appraiser H on June 7, 2017 - Contents of appraisal: 5,714,840,560 won (hereinafter “the result of the court’s entrustment to appraiser K of appraisal”) shall be deemed as follows: (a) the sum of compensation for the remainder of the land excluding J land and I land among each of the instant land, and the part of the first appraisal of this case, the current status of which is 209.8 square meters assessed as a site; and (b) the result of the court’s entrustment to appraiser K of the appraisal of this case (hereinafter “the result of the appraisal of this case”).

Among them, according to the current status confirmed by the airline in 1966 as the utilization status of each of the lots of land in this case, the results of specific appraisal shall be as shown in the attached Form.

1. The phrase “the result of the instant supplementary appraisal” as the same in the table;

hereinafter referred to as “instant complementary appraisal”

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 (including Gaz.);