Of the crimes of No. 1. Each of the crimes listed in the [Attachment] No. 1 to No. 176, the sentence against the accused shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for four months at the Gwangju District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 27, 2014.

1. On March 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered “F”, “G”, and “G” in the name column of address column in the new service contract paper kept at the site for the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s “E” mobile phone agency in Gwangju Mine-gu; (b) forged one copy of a new service contract under the above F, which is a private document concerning rights and duties, signed at will on the name side of the name; and (c) subsequently, sent the said new service contract document to the omitted employee under the name of the SK Telecom Co., Ltd. through a computer system as if it was a document duly formed; and (d) forged the new service contract document under the attached Table 202, as stated in the attached Table of Crimes, and forged the new service contract document under the name of the Defendant, which is a private document regarding the rights and duties of the F, thereby exercising 20 copies of the new service contract under the name of the Defendant’s rights and duties through the computer system.

2. Fraud against victim I;

A. On April 18, 2013, the Defendant called on April 18, 2013, the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) that “The Defendant called “the Defendant called the victim I (33 years of age) to open the two mobile phones in the name of J where he needs to open the two mobile phones to him, and the two mobile phones will open them to the name of J. In addition, 41 of the core chips are required to change the name, and sent them to Kwikset service.”

However, the fact is that the defendant was unable to escape from the enemy because the mobile phone agency business operated from May 2013 was not run smoothly, and approximately KRW 300 million was borne by the defendant, and even if he received the above things from the victim, he/she can open or pass through the mobile phone under the name of J.