logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2014.10.15 2014고합40
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(유사성행위)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by the maximum of four years and the short of three years.

Sexual assault against the defendant for 120 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is between the victim C (n, 18 years of age) and the dong at an elementary school and one month during which he/she was enrolled at a middle school.

On February 2, 2012, the Defendant taken the victim’s cell phone page D apartment rooftop, stating, “I would like to take sex-related video images and sell them, thereby making hospital expenses.” At around that time, the Defendant taken the face of the victim’s oral intercourse with the victim as a cell phone.

Since then, although the defendant demanded the victim to take a video recording of the sexual intercourse, the victim refused to take a video recording of the sexual act by threatening the victim, and continued to send text messages, etc. to the victim, and without taking an additional video recording, the previous video recording could be disseminated.

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

A. On July 11, 2013, around 14:52, the Defendant sent a text message to the victim (the age of 16 at that time) on the stairs that are going up on the 303 rooftop of the apartment house at regular Eup, which read, “I cannot prevent the victim from spreading all images to the Internet, if I do not take a sexual act video,” and let the victim enter the place above the victim, and let the victim, who was in the state of failing to resist drinkingly due to such intimidation, enter the victim’s sexual organ.

B. On July 21, 2013, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 12:57.

The victim threatened the victim in the same manner at the same place as the statement in the port, and caused the victim to promptly join the victim's sexual organ in the same manner.

C. On July 17, 2014, between around 17:00 and 18:00, the Defendant threatened the victim (the age of 17 at that time) with the phrase “it is impossible to prevent the distribution of the previous video images, which had been taken without further photographing the video.”

arrow