Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

B is the actual representative of C&A and the vice president of D, and the defendant was a person who was a business to supply the figures at the construction site executed by B.

Defendant and B conspired to obtain money from the victim F (the age of 45) who is the victim F (the age of 45) who was introduced through E, by means of false statement that they will give a false construction work, and that the interior work of the construction will give a subcontract to the victim.

On March 3, 2008, the Defendant stated to the effect that “H” office located in Ansan-si, Around March 3, 2008, the Defendant concluded to the effect that “C was awarded a contract for the interior complex construction in KRW 2.5 billion to the victim at the time of permanent residence from Hanan ENG, and the contract deposit is insufficient.” The Defendant borrowed KRW 35 million to subcontract the interior complex construction.

However, there was no intention or ability to subcontract the interior construction to the victim because C corporation was awarded a contract for the interior complex construction of the main complex building from Hanan ENG for permanent residence.

The Defendant and B are the victims, namely, cash 10 million won and the same month in exchange for a loan from the victim.

6. It was granted KRW 35 million in total, including KRW 20 million in cash, KRW 2 million in the 15th of the same month, and KRW 35 million in the 25th of the same month.

As a result, the defendant and B conspired to deception the victim and received 35 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. I's legal statement;

1. The statement made by F on the third trial date; and

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (A/J account submission);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the same Act of the same case where the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the same type of crime is added within the period of repeated crime.