A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2004 and June 2, 2005, the defendant appealed after being sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment and 5 months of imprisonment for each fraud in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, etc., and on August 3, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 1 year and 2 months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Suwon District Court's Suwon District Court for fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on March 20, 2006.

The defendant is the actual representative of the company B and the vice president of C, and D was a person who was engaged in the business of supplying the figures at the construction site of the defendant's construction site, and E was a person who has no special occupation.

1. The Defendant and D, who were introduced through D and F, conspiredd the victim G (the 45-year-old) to obtain money from the victim by falsely concluding that they would give a subcontract to the victim for the interior works of the construction.

D Around March 3, 2008, at the “I” office located in Ansan-si H, Dong-si, Dong-si, stating to the effect that “A contract is insufficient for the interior works of the main complex building for which B was awarded to the victim at KRW 2.5 billion from Han-si ENG to the permanent residence.” This means that “A contract is insufficient for the interior works of the main complex building for which B was awarded to the victim at KRW 2.5 billion.”

However, there was no intention or ability to subcontract the interior construction to the victim because B corporation was awarded a contract for the interior complex construction of the main complex building with the consent of permanent residence from Hanan ENG.

The Defendant and the Defendant’s members from D, that is, from the victim, in cash, from the victim, to the same month, for the purpose of borrowing 10 million won.

6. It was granted KRW 35 million in total, including KRW 20 million in cash, KRW 20 million in the 15th of the same month, and KRW 35 million in the 25th of the same month.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, was accused of the victim and received 35 million won.

2. The defendant, the defendant and the defendant and E mean the victim's false performance of hotel interior works, and they subcontract their interior works to the victim.