logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단3316
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the imprisonment of eight months at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 24, 2015.

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On August 21, 2014, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 1701, told the victim C to read “The name cards indicated as E-type and A” to “E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type E-type, was already leased even on the fourth floor of the D-type D-type D-type D-type D-type E-type E-type E-type. It would cause to lend money.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate the E-type Projects, and there was no fact that he leased the fourth floor of the D-building, so the victim did not have the intention or ability to subcontract the E-type Projects.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 10 million from the victim under the pretext of borrowing money, and was remitted KRW 10 million to the new bank account in the name of the F Company.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On September 5, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating that “The Defendant would follow the cultural center interior works in Yeongdeungpo-gu” to the victim C.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the authority to receive a subcontract for the interior works of the cultural center, so there was no intention or ability to receive a subcontract for the interior works of the cultural center to the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 4.5 million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant under the pretext of the commission for the Corporation brokerage.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

C. Around September 16, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C, stating, “The victim will undertake construction works for high-rise and friendship with the G hotel interior.”

However, the defendant is true, however, G hotel test.

arrow