Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the team in charge of the loan of the national bank C branch in the interesting-gu B.

1. On January 20, 2015, while serving as the head of the team in charge of lending a branch of a national bank C branch office of the National Bank C, the Defendant was willing to forge the interior construction contract for the purpose of using the said loan review while performing the credit loan business of KRW 1.60,000,000 for loans under the name of a mother-friendly D.

On 2015, the Defendant: (a) written in the column of the contractor with the title “E interior”, “F” and “F” in the name of the representative, “Seoul Metropolitan Government Middle-gu G Building 201,” using a computer network program at a non-fluorial site; and (b) affixed a seal attached in advance to the name of the F.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the interior contract in the name of F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On 2015, the Defendant exercised the foregoing investigation document by attaching D’s credit loan-related documents, as if the construction contract was duly concluded at a branch of the National Bank C, as seen above, at the point of the Franchis Bank C.

3. On October 2, 2015, while serving as the head of the team in charge of loans by a branch of a national bank C branch, the Defendant was dealing with the credit loan of KRW 116 million in the name of H, who is the head of the National Bank C.

On the other hand, the Korean National Bank of the Victim Co., Ltd. has confirmed the details of the applicant's real estate, deposits, etc. in the business of the loan manager, and determined the credit rating by preparing these contents as a credit assessment report, and set the loanable amount and the loan interest rate

Nevertheless, in relation to the lending business of H, the Defendant may prepare a credit assessment report by stating false facts in KRW 1 billion with the knowledge that the value of the H’s real estate is KRW 86 million in connection with the lending business of H, and submit it to the head of the branch office of the Korean Bank C branch office, who is aware of such fact.