logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.07.05 2016고단2514
공기호위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2016, the Defendant forged a car registration number plate by setting up a “B” registration number plate with green and white traw, for the purpose of exercising a fine for negligence on the iron plate, in front of the Agricultural Cooperatives, the Republic of Korea in the middle of the 2016, in order to prevent the Defendant from putting it up on the iron plate, with the aim of exercising a fine for negligence.

2. From June 2016 to August 11, 2016, the Defendant exercised the registration number plate of “B” motor vehicle, which is the symbol of a forged public office, as described in paragraph 1, by attaching the registration number plate to the above cargo vehicle and operating the said vehicle.

3. No person who violates the Automobile Management Act shall use a forged or forged motor vehicle registration number plate;

Nevertheless, the defendant forged a car registration number plate as in paragraph 1, and used a forged car registration number plate as in paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Seizure records;

1. Photographss of vehicles and number plates;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Motor Vehicle Registration Register;

1. Article 238 (1) (the point of Article 238 of the Criminal Act), Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) (the point of exercising forged air defense) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 78 subparagraph 2 and 71 (1) (the point of using forged registration number plates) of the Automobile Management Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The court shall comprehensively consider all elements of sentencing as indicated in the record and trial process of the instant case, including the following: (a) undermining public trust by forging and using the defense of the reasoning air for sentencing under Article 48(1)2 of the Confiscation Criminal Act; (b) avoiding punishment and escape; (c) the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, living environment, and circumstances after committing a crime, and determine the sentence as ordered.

arrow