Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 5, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 1.5 million at the General Military Court of the Army from January 5, 2009 to a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and on November 20, 2009 to a fine of KRW 3 million at the Jeju District Court from November 20, 200 to a summary order of Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.

At around 00:20 on August 28, 2012, the Defendant driven the Category B 5 car from the section of the section B of the area B of the area B from the National Land Management and Utilization Act, which was about 400 to the area B from the area B of the area B from the area B to the area B of the area B from the area B of the area B to the area B of the area B from the area B of the area B of the National Land Management and Utilization Act, which was the center of the luscian 787

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Images related to accidents, reports on detection of drinking drivers, records on drinking measurements, and statements in the circumstances of drinking drivers;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol by the defendant. The drunk driving is a dangerous crime that may lead to a serious accident that may lead to another person's life. As the recent revision of the Road Traffic Act, the punishment for the act of drunk driving has been greatly strengthened, despite the fact that the defendant had already been punished twice due to drunk driving or a fine, the defendant committed the crime of this case in the same manner, and the defendant committed a collision while driving under the influence of alcohol and causing physical damage. In light of the above, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

However, all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant, which reflects his mistake, and in the future, it is expected that the defendant will not drive under the influence of alcohol again, and it is heavier than a fine.