Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Cheongju District Court Jeju Branch on December 5, 2007, and a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on July 25, 201 with a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Goyang Branch District Court on March 25, 201.

On June 10, 2012, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 00:45% of blood alcohol content, driven a B-XG car at approximately 800 meters away from the front of the Yong-Nam apartment located in the Yongnam apartment located in Singu-si, Singu, Sinung-dong to approximately 0.108% of the same 1790.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiry report on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (report accompanied by a copy of summary order) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is deemed to have driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol by the defendant. The drunk driving is a dangerous crime that may lead to a serious accident that may lead to another person's life. As the recent revision of the Road Traffic Act, the punishment for the act of drunk driving has been greatly strengthened, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in the same manner even though he had the record of being punished twice due to drunk driving or a fine, even though he had already been punished twice or a fine, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant.

However, this case where the defendant recognized the crime of this case and there is no record of being sentenced to the punishment heavier than the fine, the distance of the defendant's drunk driving is not clear, and only the defendant requested a formal trial for the summary order.