The punishment of the accused shall be eight months by imprisonment.

However, the execution of imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2016, around 07:25, the Defendant was arrested in the office of integrated investigation of the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun Police Station 21-ro 29 (Cheongyangdong Police Station) in Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant’s spouse paid a fine to the Defendant and released the Defendant’s spouse upon the Defendant’s payment of the fine. The Defendant’s spouse expressed the Defendant’s “I am frighthhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

As such, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the crime prevention of police officers E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police officer statement concerning E, and statement of F;

1. The place where the custodian works as the protective shelter;

1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (Article 136(1) of the same Act (Article 136(1) of the same Act) (Article 136(1) of the same Act provides that the person has been punished for obstruction of performance of official duties or damage to public goods in 200 and 2004, respectively;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration to the fact that deposit one million won with the purport of an apology with the damaged police, and that it would not be re-feasible for the same mistake);