1. The Defendant: KRW 10,503,30 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from November 24, 2015 to October 26, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) B was employed by the Defendant on April 11, 2006, and around November 13, 2015, around 2015, the Defendant’s automobile parts manufacturing factory located no more than 6 d d d d d d d f d d d d d d d d d d d d g d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d e- d d d d d d d d d d d d d g.

3) A luminous safety device is installed around the transferred robots, and there is a luminous safety device that allows persons to stop the transferred robots if any, etc. The luminous safety device is installed. The luminous safety device is not more than 20 mss(0.02 seconds) (0 ms(0.02 seconds). (4) B, at around 22:30 on November 13, 2015, was passing away from the work site and passed away, and around 22:30:22 on the same day, she was well aware of the b2:30:23 on the same day between the transferred robots and the inspection site. At around 22:30,000 on the same day, the luminous safety device was transferred to the inspection site on the finished products of the transferred robots, and the b2:30:25 on the same day, was transferred to the hospital.

5) The heir in B has a mother and wife C. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12, Gap evidence No. 15-2, Eul evidence No. 15-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings, the images and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition as the basis for the liability for damages, if B enters the transfer robots and the land bags for inspection, the light-line safety devices should reduce B and suspend the operation of the robots for transfer.