logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2020.12.09 2019가단108260
물품대금
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

The facts are recognized by the Defendant: (a) contracted with C (hereinafter “C”) to install a freezing food package and stuff automationr of the sowing plant; (b) on January 8, 2019, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on the basis that the Plaintiff would pay 140,800,000 won (the supply price of 128,000,000 won and value-added tax 12,80,000,000 won (hereinafter “instant contract”); (c) the payment of the down payment of the down payment of the intermediate payment of 30%, 30% after the intermediate payment of the intermediate payment of us, 30% after the intermediate payment of the remainder payment of 40% after the delivery and the remainder of the goods.

On January 7, 2019, the Plaintiff determined that, prior to the conclusion of the instant contract with the Defendant, at least 500g and up to 1kg at the working speed of robots, products are at the speed of disposing of at least 50g per minute, products less than 50g and products less than 500g are at the speed of disposing of at least 60 per minute, and the product rink process is at the speed of disposing of at least 60 products.

The defendant paid the down payment and intermediate payment to the plaintiff in accordance with the agreement.

The Plaintiff supplied and installed the instant robot to C in the end of April 2019, and around the end of April, 2019. As a result of the trial run from the end of April 2019 to July 2019, the Plaintiff failed to pass an examination because it failed to perform the process of loading the instant robot on packaging materials by Belgium.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's claim as to the facts without dispute, the statements in Gap 2, 3, and 4 evidence, and the grounds for claim as to the whole purport of the pleadings is to be determined. The plaintiff completed the manufacture of the robot of this case under the contract of this case and supplied it to Cmju factory designated by the defendant, but the realization of the robot of this case must be established by the defendant.

arrow