1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the claims extended by the Plaintiff in this court, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasons for this part of the underlying facts are as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for partial dismissal or addition as follows. As such, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (Articles 4, 11, 12, and 4 of the judgment of the first instance). Thus, this is

▣ 제1심 판결문 제5면 제3행 중 “최초 신탁계약”을 “최초 신탁계약의 특약사항”으로 고친다.

▣ 제1심 판결문 제9면 제9행 중 “신탁계약”을 “신탁(확정판결)”으로 고친다.

▣ 제1심 판결문 제10면 위쪽 [표] 아래 제1행 중 “피고 B의 계좌로”를 “피고 C 명의의 계좌(K은행 U)로”로, 아래쪽 [표] 내의 두 번째 [표] 계좌번호란의 “L”를 “U”로 각 고친다.

▣ 제1심 판결문 제11면 위쪽 [표] 아래 제3행 중 “2014. 1. 27.”을 “2014. 1. 25.”로, “1차 분양계약”을 “기존 분양계약”으로 각 고친다.

▣ 제1심 판결문 제12면 제2행 중 “제7, 11, 21”을 “갑 제7, 11, 14, 15, 21”로 고친다.

2. Determination as to Defendant C’s main defense

A. Defendant C’s assertion against Defendant C is a claim for the future performance of the claim for the transfer registration procedure of the ownership of the commercial building of this case (the primary claim and the primary claim). Even if the Plaintiff paid the sale price in full in the future, Defendant C has no possibility of maintaining ownership of the commercial building of this case at that time, so there is no benefit of claim or protection of rights.

B. In a lawsuit for performance of judgment, the standing to be the defendant is nominal by the plaintiff's claim itself, and such judgment is absorbed into the judgment of propriety of the claim, so the person alleged as the obligor is a legitimate defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Da18451, Nov. 28, 1995). A lawsuit for future performance may be brought only when a prior claim is required. Thus, in advance, a prior claim is required.