1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against Defendant B, C, and D in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

With respect to this case, this court's use is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal of the corresponding parts as follows. Thus, this court's use is citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, "2. 18. through 2. 20. . . . . . . . . . . . . .."

From February 12, 2007 to February 19, 2008, the term “the Plaintiff served as a director on the Plaintiff’s corporate register” in the fourth sentence of the judgment of the first instance court shall be as follows: “The Plaintiff served as a director on the Plaintiff’s corporate register; from February 12, 2007 to February 19, 2008; and from February 20, 2008 to December 31, 2009, as the term “the head of the Development Headquarters”.

The following shall be added between the five pages 18 and 19 of the judgment of the first instance:

f. The Seoul Central District Court, on August 27, 2014, rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation proceedings against the Plaintiff on the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against the Plaintiff, and on the failure to appoint a manager, N, the representative director of the Plaintiff, becomes a legal manager of the Plaintiff’s (2014 Gohap10057, 157 (Merger)). The term “prepaid claim” in Section 7 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to read “prepaid claim” in Section 10 of the 10th judgment of the first instance court.

From the bottom of the 12th judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “A Na 6” in the second sentence shall be read as “B 6 B”.

From the bottom of the 14th judgment of the first instance court, the "each person" shall be jointly referred to as "joint", and the "business chief" shall be referred to as "occupational chief", respectively.

The following shall be added between the 16th sentence of the first instance court and the 19th sentence and 20th sentence:

[In this regard, the plaintiff asserts that since the above defendants committed a tort against the plaintiff with intention or gross negligence, the liability should not be limited.

However, it is not allowed that a person who intentionally committed a tort by taking advantage of the victim's care is not entitled to pay his or her responsibility for the reason of the victim's care.