logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.04.11 2017고정1502
업무방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are the occupants of the F apartment in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and the victim G, the chairperson of the council of occupants of the above apartment, is not the chairperson of the committee of occupants of the apartment, nor the chairperson of the committee of occupants of the apartment.

I think of the complaint, I would like to find the victim's office as an organization in the victim's office and to resist it.

On May 10, 2016, the Defendants found the victim's office located on the second floor of the above apartment management office, and Defendant D is the victim, who was conducting the meeting of the representative director of the occupants, with the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the company.

Since it is not possible to sit, our residents will dump by dump through their decline.

There is no qualification for the Chairperson and there is no qualification for executive officers.

Defendant C said, “I have to go to go to the meeting of executive officers” and Defendant C said, “I have to go to go to the meeting of executive officers in which I have to go to go to the meeting of executive officers in which I have to go to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the first place, to go to the flash, to go to the flash, to whom the person is to go to go to the meeting of the person who is to go to the outside.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the progress of the representative director meeting of apartment occupants who is the chairperson of the apartment association.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the witness G in the third public trial records;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Presentation of Materials by an complainant);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, applicable to the order of provisional payment;

arrow