All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) from February 1, 2013 to August 2013, 2013; (b) from September 1, 2013 to May 2014, Defendant A’s representative meeting of occupants of the said apartment; (c) from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2015, Defendant B’s representative of the said apartment; and (d) from September 1, 2013 to October 30, 2014, Defendant C was a person who was the said apartment 101 representative from September 1, 2013 to October 30, 2014; and (d) the victim E is an officetel and commercial building (hereinafter “officetel”).

The manager of the management group is the manager of the management group.

The above D 101 units, 102 units, apartment buildings, 103 units, and 104 units are officetelss, and the victim E was selected as officetels representatives with the consent of the residents of officetels, and on September 2013, five representatives of apartment occupants' meetings including the Defendants and the victim of officetels entered into an agreement to manage apartment houses and officetels in combination.

The Defendants and the Chairperson of the Council of Representatives of Apartments prepared an officetel management body to be operated by the Integrated Management Committee due to conflicts arising from the selection of service companies, and the Defendants agreed to distribute documents to the above apartment and officetel residents to the effect that the victims would receive the public funds of the residents, not legitimate officetels representatives, to prevent them from being selected and managed separately from apartment units.

1. On March 2014, the Defendants filed an accusation for the thickness of the occupants of an apartment.

According to the title of “the abuse of rights granted voting rights to a non-qualified representative (103, 104)” as if the injured party attended the meeting of the representatives of occupants due to the abuse of the power of the chairperson of the representatives of occupants and exercised voting rights and received 300,000 won per month from the public fund collected by the occupants of apartment buildings as a representative of occupants.