logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.04.11 2018구합70999
전학 등 처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 18, 2018, the Plaintiff transferred to D Middle Schools E (hereinafter referred to as “instant school”) from the third and fourth grade.

B. On July 10, 2018, the Defendant was reported by the Plaintiff to assault another student, and was prepared and submitted by F, G, H, I, J, and K each written confirmation of school violence on the same day.

C. On July 11, 2018, the Defendant was prepared and submitted by the Plaintiff a written confirmation of school violence with the purport of “H at the classroom on July 5, 2018.”

On July 12, 2018, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence in the instant case (hereinafter “instant Committee”) deliberated on the case of school violence with respect to the Plaintiff, and requested the Defendant to take five (5) days of suspension of attendance, transfer, and special education to the Plaintiff, based on the following facts as the cause of the measure (hereinafter “instant cause of measure”).

1. On June 3, 2018, in front of the classroom 6th half of the victim student F (3th grade 6th grade) on June 2018, the Plaintiff, who was in F, opened the classroom in front of the classroom 6th grade, was f, and the Plaintiff responded to the defect F, “Ismi and Besmi,” “Ismi”.

The Plaintiff reported F on the same day, and said F as “drawing it,” and F was called as “fat........” The Plaintiff sold F’s name as drinking, not as “fat?” but as “fat is.....”

The plaintiff, who was the plaintiff of F, was the plaintiff of F's 1st floor of F's 1st floor of F and then the plaintiff was the plaintiff of F's 1st floor of F's dubage. The plaintiff was the plaintiff of F's dubl and the plaintiff of F was the plaintiff of F's dubl.

The Plaintiff continued to the F, saying, “I have to go to see how you will see” the F, “I have to go to see.”

The plaintiff takes up the F's bridge with a large price of the F, etc., which goes beyond the F's bridge, and fulbling the bridge of F.

arrow