The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Judgment on the acquittal portion

A. On September 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 16:10 on September 19, 2013, the Defendant: (b) driven a car owned by the Defendant himself; and (c) stopped the five-lane road from the fourth-lane road to the direction of scattering distance from the Cheongyang-dong road in the direction of a flying distance.

As such, a driver who stops a vehicle in front of the driver's will, even though he has a duty of care to accurately operate the brake system and prevent the vehicle from being pushed or traveling in front of the driver's will, the defendant neglected to do so, and thereby, proceeds in front of the vehicle by putting Bracks in the signal while driving the vehicle in front of the vehicle, and the victim D (ma, 46 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal was driven by the victim D (ma, 46 years old).

As a result, the victim suffered from the injury of climatic salt, etc., which requires about two weeks of treatment period to the victim F (the 44 years of age), the injury of climatic salt, etc., which requires about two weeks of treatment period to the victim F (the 11 years of age), the injury of climatic salt, etc., which requires about seven days of treatment period to the victim G (the 11 years of age), and the injury of climatic salt, etc., which requires about seven days of treatment period to the climatic victim H (the 14 years of age). At the same time, the victim H (the 14 years of age) suffered from the injury of climatic salt, etc., which requires about 314,796 won of the estimated cost of repairing the damaged vehicle, but at the same time, the victim F (the 44 years of age), who was the f

B. (1) The provision on the aggravated punishment of an escape vehicle driver under Article 5-3(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 148 of the Road Traffic Act shall not only protect the public interest of traffic safety, but also protect the victim of an accident.