beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for four years, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and six months, respectively.
However, as to Defendant B, the same shall apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On February 1, 2008, Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on November 9, 2010, and the execution of the sentence was completed on January 23, 2012 at the Busan District Court on January 23, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on May 7, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Defendants A and B, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, forged the 50,000 won of the issuance of the president of the Bank of Korea, and conspired to use it, and then made 200 copies of the 50,00 won of the issuance of the president of the Bank of Korea (hereinafter “the 59 pages”) by inserting four 50,000 won of the 50,000 won of the issuance of the president of the Bank of Korea at the home of Defendant B located in the Jin-gu, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “the 59 pages”).
As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge the abolition of the Republic of Korea used for the purpose of exercising the rights.
2. Defendant A and C’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes ( Monetary Forgery) made a solicitation to purchase Mesphere, psychotropic drugs, using 50,000 won notes issued by the president of the Bank of Korea who was forged on July 10, 2013, and the Defendant offered to purchase Mesphere (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”). At around 21:00 on the same day, at around 21:0, he purchased approximately 3 glopons from H and I, which were known to ordinary places at the parking lot of the Gospon-si, J and I, and 50,00 won notes of 60,000 won notes were 59, but according to Defendant A, witness H and I’s partial statement, etc., the said witness sold the Mespopon to Defendant at the time, and Defendant A issued only forged Mespopon to the said witness.