1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 14, 2013, around 12:00 on March 14, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as following the victim’s disturbance: (a) in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (n,e.g., the 51-year-old), and the victim was found to not share the restaurant club business; and (b) in the case where the victim was a restaurant customer, the victim was in a restaurant customer, and the victim was able to engage in the restaurant business.

2. On March 16, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business on March 16, 2013, in the above “E” restaurant around 19:00 on March 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) laid the beer’s disease on the floor; (b) broken the beer’s room for the same reason; (c) sound the restaurant to the restaurant; (d) sound the restaurant’s customer “cafeteria”; and (e) embling the victim’s her husbandF’s fat and taking a bath, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.

3. On April 15, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business on April 15, 2013, within the “E” restaurant around 15:00 on April 15, 2013, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “the same bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Business registration certificate, on-site photographs, investigation reports, and application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is that the defendant has been punished by violence twice, and that the defendant repeatedly obstructed the victim's restaurant business, and that there is no color to seriously reflect the crime in this court is unfavorable.

However, it is the fact that the defendant has agreed smoothly with the victim.