(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.08.20 2019나12078

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.08.20 2019나12078

공사대금

Text

All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

Reasons

1. The grounds for this court’s explanation are as follows: (a) adding or adding some contents to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) adding a judgment on the Plaintiff’s new argument to this court, the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Part III of the judgment of the court of first instance added or added by this court to "Masan-gun D" to "B" to "B" to "B" (i.e., 123 million won, 71.5 million won, (ii)" to "(i.e., 132 million won, 71.5 million won, including value-added tax)" to "(i.e., 120 million won, 123 million won, 10 billion won" to "132 million won," and (ii) of "B" to "B (i.e. 132 million won - 98.56 million won - KRW 98.6 million - KRW 132 million -9.5 million - KRW 19.5 million - KRW 71.5 million -57 million," and (iii) of "W" to "W" to "B" to "B" to "B" to "B", 180 million won.

In the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, the defendants jointly and severally deleted “10,000 won,” the fifth part “190,000 won,” and the 18th part and the 19th part “4,190,000 won (=2,8730,000 won)” shall read “4,1490,000 won (=2,8730,000 won KRW 8,60,000).”

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court, "The G architect office of this court" shall be deemed to be "G architect office of the first instance court", "displacement" in Part 17, "Defendants" in Part 19 shall be deemed to be "Defendants", and "placement" in Part 1 of Part 1 shall be deemed to be "design".

The part installed in the land annexed to this case shall be added between the 6th judgment of the first instance and the 8th judgment and the 8th judgment.

The Defendant’s “The 7th part of the first instance judgment” was deleted, “The adjoining site” was deleted, “The 15th part of the 15th part of the 15th part of the 17th part of the 15th part of the 17th part of the 15th part of the 17th part of the 17th part of the 17th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part

Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance is "in accordance with instructions" and 19.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2018.02.01 2017나50324

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.26 2018나1666

-인천지방법원 2020.11.24 2020나58055

-수원지방법원 2018.03.29 2017나11176

-서울고등법원 2018.07.11 2017나2021204