1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of “3. Additional Judgment” as to the assertion that the Defendant emphasizes in this court, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance in the same part, the phrase “E is 2.06/86/3,040 of the equity interest,” as “E is 2.06/86/3,040 of the equity interest.”

On the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, "The lease deposit shall be KRW 10 million" shall be deemed "the lease deposit shall be KRW 10 million."

If the first instance judgment No. 4, 12 of the first instance judgment, "the remainder of the premium payment date" is regarded as "the remainder of the premium payment date".

On the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the Defendant’s first 10th “Defendant” is regarded as the Plaintiff.

In the 8th judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff’s 13th and 14th and the Defendant’s 17th “Defendant,” respectively. The Plaintiff’s 8th and 18th of the first instance judgment deleted “Defendant,” and added “Defendant,” in front of “Defendant,” the 18th of the first instance judgment. The 8th and 20th of the first instance judgment, “the 8th of the first instance judgment,” “the 13th of the first instance judgment,” and “the 14th of the first instance judgment,” “the 3th of the first instance judgment,” is regarded as “a recognized.”

3. Additional determination

A. The Defendant’s assertion that the premium contract for KRW 140 million between the Plaintiff and F for the instant commercial building was a network cost (transfer of membership position). The Plaintiff is operating a membership store using the “mutual name and telephone number account book, etc.” in the building in which the instant commercial building is located (hereinafter “the instant building”). Since a certified brokerage business can only establish a “person who has a licensed real estate agent’s license,” there is no intangible premium even if the office is transferred or taken over, there is no premium.

Therefore, there is no loss incurred to the plaintiff.

B. The result of the appraisal of the premium price of appraiser I, as well as the descriptions and images of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 20, Eul evidence No. 1, and appraiser I.