The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is between the victim B and the married couple, and is currently pending in a divorce lawsuit.

On March 27, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document and forged a private document in the victim’s name, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations, at the D Co., Ltd. office located on the 7th floor of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul metropolitan building on March 27, 2017, without authority, for the purpose of exercising an insurance policy with the said victim’s consent, and without authority, for the said victim’s purchase of the insurance policy, the Defendant submitted to D Co., Ltd. an employee E, who is an employee of the said fee, the inspection of the F Co., Ltd. stated the F Co., Ltd.’s letter of subscription on the “B” in the name of the customer with the color pen, and used it. On the same day, the Defendant forged one copy of the written subscription in the victim’s name, which is a private document concerning the rights and obligations, and submitted it to the said employee

B. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant forged a private document and forged the private document in the name of the victim, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and submitted to the D Co., Ltd. employee, whose name could not be known as if he/she actually formed the forged subscription document at the same place on the same day, to use it without obtaining consent from the said victim, without authority, for the purpose of using it. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stated that he/she is “B” in the G subscription document kept in the said place with a color pen; and (b) signed “B” in the “contractor” in the “self signature” and “self signature” with the signature of “B” in the “contractor”; and (c) forged one copy of the written subscription document in the name of the victim, which is a private document related to rights and obligations; and (d) submitted it to the D Co., Ltd. employee, whose name is unknown as if the forged subscription document was a document duly formed.

C. On April 28, 2017, the Defendant, at the office of D Co., Ltd. as described in the foregoing Paragraph (a) on April 28, 2017, for the purpose of exercising the insurance policy without the said victim’s consent, was examined in the H subscription document kept in that place.