beta
Text
Defendant
B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Defendant
A shall be innocent.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Defendant B was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on November 24, 2016 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 18, 2017.
[Criminal Facts]
1. On January 2015, Defendant B, as the former representative director of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., was known to Defendant A, the president of the business of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which was operated by the victim F, in the first and second French house located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, the first and second executive officers of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., the Defendant B supplied the same coffee to the victim in terms of the legal provisions that would give rise to the law of law and regulations to the Plaintiff even through a professor of the Seoul Cyber University I, which was related to the officer.
It is necessary to pay 200 million won to carry on manufacturing and distributing business in full by using such manufacturing technology and connection.
If 200 million won is invested, it will be divided into 5:5 of profits for the joint operation by establishing a particular coffee manufacturing company and dividing them into 5:5 and purchase at least 10 tons per month.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, Defendant B is urged to pay his personal debt to J, K, L, M, etc. for KRW 5-600 million, and there is no relationship with the executives of large enterprises, such as slots, etc., and he is agreed by N andO to make an investment of KRW 300 million in total of KRW 150 million and to make an investment of KRW 300 million, and he was agreed to make an investment of KRW 300 million on January 6, 2015. However, even if Defendant B did not make an investment, and he did not have any intent or ability to purchase more than 10 tons of the source of the set-off company or purchase more than 10 million of the source of the set-off, even if he did not receive the above money from the injured party because he did not normally have made an investment, and there was no intention or ability to purchase the said money from the injured party.
Defendant
B In such a manner, around January 8, 2015, by deceiving the victim, the victim was delivered KRW 200 million to the new bank account (Account Number: P) in the name of the defendant B.
2. Defendant B is a mutual infinite restaurant in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, in February 2015.