logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.25 2014고단3715
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of heading 2014 and heading 627 of order.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

B On October 13, 2014, the Daejeon District Court sentenced 8 years to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Daejeon District Court on February 12, 2015, and sentenced 3 times more than that of the above judgment. Defendant A was sentenced to 2 years of suspension of execution on September 5, 2012 in imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and for 2 times more than that of the above judgment.

When Defendant B was investigated into the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), etc. of the above Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes") and the investigation was conducted on February 3, 2007, Defendant B conspired with Defendant A who resides in the Republic of Korea with the Chinese company and obtained knowledge that there was a dispute over the price of goods equivalent to ten billion won with the Chinese company, which was living in the Republic of Ulsan-gu E on February 3, 207, to acquire money by deceiving the victim as if he could resolve

As above, in collusion with the Defendants at the victim F Office in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, on September 22, 2011, Defendant A, the representative director of the victim company Eul, "B has a relationship with the high-ranking floor inside China, so that the case of goods payment can be resolved by making up for them. In success, 20% of the recovered amount should be given, and the expenses such as gift expenses for the high-ranking floor inside China should be paid first, and KRW 100 million should be changed first as the retainer amount." Defendant B, by entering the above G into China, was believed to have a relationship with the high-ranking floor inside China.

However, in fact, Defendant A consumed some of the retainers transferred for personal purposes 24.1 million won, which is part of the retainers, and Defendant B was a designated receipt while being investigated into a case by deceiving a large number of victims by deceiving a large amount of victims, and even though he forged another’s passport and escaped to China, he did not neglect it, and the victim was inside China.

arrow