All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged against the Defendants is as follows: “Defendant A is working in C (hereinafter “C”) from January 12, 2010 to February 5, 2012, and is a person who is in charge of the duties of direction, direction, and supervision over F by preparing policies and standards on authorization, permission, and certification for the manufacture, sale, quality control, etc. of drugs while working in E from February 6, 2012 to May 2, 2013; and Defendant B was the vice president of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) that produces caps necessary for the manufacture of drugs and produces functional health foods.

Defendant

B was under the process of transferring a large-scale new factory that produces medicine to H and I from around 2011 to around 2013, and therefore, in accordance with the production facility standards (GMP) made by the C E, it was required to obtain permission and certification for new manufacturing facilities for the above period from F. G was normally subject to regulation from C in the future regarding prevention and safety of food and drugs and health functional foods, and thus it was important that G would normally be subject to regulation from C in the future, and thus, it was not possible to refuse Defendant A’s request related to the introduction of business or employment recommendation by the Defendant’s wife K.

1. Provision of employment opportunities for L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “L”);

A. On August 2012, Defendant A’s wife of the Defendant’s acceptance of bribe requested B to the effect that “to introduce the package gambling business at which the trade name in Gangnam-gu Seoul is unknown.” The Defendant called “K will go to the representative M of L, who is a subordinate company of G, and will give advice by making a farcing a farcing farcing farcing farcing farcing.”