1. The defendant delivers the building from the attached list to the plaintiff, and (1) as well as (2) 17.6 million won and "4.0 million won."

1. Indication of claims: The grounds for claims shall be as shown in the annexed sheet;

2. Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 and the main sentence of Article 150 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. 피고의 주장에 대한 판단{피고는 “건물주(☞ 원고)가 수리해줘야 되는 것을 무리하게 세입자(☞ 피고)에게 전가”하였으므로 원고의 이 사건 각 청구가 부당하다는 취지로 다투지만, 을 1~35의 각 일부 기재 또는 영상만으로는 이 점을 인정하기에 부족하고, 그밖에 이를 인정할 만한 증거가 없으므로, 피고가 내세우는 위 주장은 받아들일 수 없음}

4. According to the conclusion, inasmuch as a lease contract on a building, which is the object of the lease, has already been terminated lawfully, the defendant is obligated to deliver the above building, which is the object of the lease, to the plaintiff, and (2) to pay the plaintiff the overdue rent or unjust enrichment by the rate of 17.6 million won in total and 4.4 million won in each month from April 30, 2020 to April 29, 2020, respectively, as the plaintiff seeks to fulfill the respective obligations.