Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 13, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 10:10 on July 13, 2020, the Defendant: (b) committed theft with the intent of managers, such as the pointmen in Gwangju Northern-gu B; (c) with the intent to steal displayed goods whose surveillance is neglected; and (d) with seven goods, such as the victim D handbling, etc., put the goods on a camera in the sum of KRW 33,938,00 in the market value of seven goods, such as the victim D’s handbling, etc.; and (b) stolen the goods owned by the victim by removing the bar code of the goods in question and leaving the kart with some settlement goods.

2. On August 3, 2020, around 12:06, around August 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with the intent of a manager to steal displayed goods, such as a cresh in which the manager’s surveillance was neglected; (b) had the goods totaling KRW 184,990 on the market price of 15 goods, such as a lux container, etc. owned by the victim D; and (c) cut off the goods in question by removing the bar code of the goods in question and neglecting a luxation with some normal payments.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the receipt for re-issuance of each E and F statement, the photographs of damaged goods, each CCTV image data, and the details of theft data;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that a defendant has been punished several times for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and that the defendant repeatedly commits each of the larceny crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime due to larceny, there is a need to strictly punish the defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes his mistake and reflects it, and the amount of damage suffered by the victim due to the crime of this case is significant.

It is difficult to see that the injured party has agreed with the injured party, and the injured party is punished.