Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On March 15, 2013, at around 01:55, the Defendant: (a) boarded and arrived at a taxi operated by the victim D in front of Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul; and (b) assaulted the victim’s face twice by drinking, and at the same time by drinking it.
B. The Defendant above A.
The victim C does not pay a taxi fee at the same time and place as the paragraph, and the victim C does not pay a taxi fee.
As in the same paragraph, he/she abused himself/herself as a taxi engineer D, he/she saw him/herself, and assaulted him/her at the time of the victim's bucking and earing.
2. Determination and crime of non-compliance with the conclusion: Article 260(1) and (3) of the Criminal Act: Rejection of public prosecution under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act (the injured party expressed his/her intention not to punish the accused on May 14, 2013 and May 15, 2013, respectively after the prosecution of this case).