logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.08.16 2018고단753
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 10, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of ten months for special larceny, etc. at the Suwon Gan prison, and on December 3, 2017, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence at the Gan prison.

[2] On December 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a door of a Racing vehicle owned by the victim C and entered the vehicle into the vehicle at around 07:30,00 on December 11, 2017, which was not corrected at the Gyeonggi-si B lending parking lot; and (b) cut off the amount of KRW 3,462,40,00 in total eight times from around that time to March 30, 201 as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes.

"2018 Highest 1301"

1. On May 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a door in the victim F-owned G vehicle parked in the front parking lot in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si on May 27, 2018; (b) opened an unrectible door on the victim F-owned G vehicle; and (c) cut off with one credit card copy owned by the

2. On May 27, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit Business: “I” bank located in Gwangju City H on May 19:0, 2018, as if the Defendant completed the stolen credit card as stated in the above 1. paragraph, and as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s credit card, deceiving the victim by means of settling the purchase price to the victims under the name of the victim, and then deceiving the victim, which was the sum of the market price of the damage, by means of money 4 million won in total, and by delivery of gold straw, and the stolen credit card was used.

3. On May 27, 2018, the Defendant of the violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and the violation of the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Credit is deceiving the victim by means of settling the stolen credit card with the Defendant’s credit card as stated in the above 1. paragraph at the GJ of Gwangju City, as if the Defendant’s credit card was the Defendant’s credit card, and deceiving the victim by means of settling the amount with the name of the victim who was not the victim of the bank, and raising the amount to the total market value of the victim.

arrow