logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.05.30 2016고단1125
공문서부정행사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of two years and two months.

12,100,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on January 15, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 19, 201.

"2016 Highest 1125"

1. The Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

A. On October 4, 2016, at around 19:00, the Defendant administered phiphones by dilution approximately 0.03 g, a single medication, in a toilet located in the Defendant’s residence in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Madon-si, and 5 (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”). The Defendant administered philopon by means of injecting approximately 0.03 g, a single medication, into the left part by dilution with a single injection device.

B. On October 18, 2016, around 11:15, the Defendant: (a) parked on the lower corner of the E cafeteria building located in Masan-si, Changwon-si; (b) stored 0.05g, 0.04g, and 0.03g, in three transparent vinyl bags, the Defendant’s filterphone was kept in the lower corner of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s operation, and carried a total of 0.12g, written phone.

2. Illegal uttering of official documents;

A. On October 15, 2016, the Defendant applied for an interview under the name of H in order to reverse the statement that he/she administered a phiphone with the Defendant by visiting G in the process of committing a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (comprehion) at the meeting room of the Changwon Prison in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Changwon-si. In order to request the reversal of the statement that he/she administered a phiphone with the Defendant, the Defendant refused to use the official document as if he/she presented the H’s driver’s license, which is a public document held in advance by the public official I who was requested to present an identification card by the public official I in charge.

B. On October 17, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for an interview under the name of H in order to visit the G in the prison for the same reasons as the set forth in the foregoing paragraph, and was in possession of the Defendant at H in advance upon request by the public official J in charge, who was requested to present an identification card.

arrow