A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On October 17, 2017, at around 17:00, the Defendant administered philophones by means of throwting approximately 0.03 g of mephones (one philophones; hereinafter “philophones”), a local mental medicine, in the Defendant’s residence (original Mapo-gu C).

2. On October 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) delivered philophones in front of D on October 18:30, 2017, the Defendant provided F with approximately 0.05g philophones to F in front of D (C) (C).

3. On October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) delivered philophones in front of G acids and clinics; (b) around 02:10 on October 13, 2017, the Defendant provided F with 0.18 g philophones in front of “G acids and Assistants” located in H in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of the written investigation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a record of seizure and a list of seizure, a report on investigation (12) , a list of narcotics transaction prices, and an appraisal report;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection of and Management of Narcotics, Etc. for Crimes ( punished by imprisonment)

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. [the scope of the recommended sentence] medication, simple possession, etc., and the scope of the final sentence according to the aggravated punishment for multiple crimes in the basic area (10 months to 2 years) of the types of crimes (10 months from 10 months to 3 years) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.: the consideration of the matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the following: (a) within the scope of the above sentence according to the sentencing guidelines, the defendant was a superior in relation to F; (b) the defendant was a criminal record of the same sentence in 208; and (c) the fact that a general cooperation can be assessed as having been made by clarifying the upper line.