Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2009Nu27154 (2010.04.07)
Case Number of the previous trial
early 2009 Heavy063 (2009.03.05)
Title
Whether or not farmland has been afforested for 8 years or more;
Summary
It is difficult to believe that most of the periods for which the Plaintiff asserted that he was self-employed were engaged in food and miscellaneous retail business, etc.
The decision
The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per