logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.09 2014가합586899
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: 10,000,000 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from July 3, 2014 to November 9, 2016; and

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related Plaintiff A is a person who was performed an operation, such as spine removal surgery, at the Seoul National University Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and led to the safinium, and Plaintiff B is a child of Plaintiff A.

B. Plaintiff A’s internal source and operation process 1) around 11 months after birth, and thereafter, Plaintiff A entered into the ebrate center of the Defendant Hospital. Plaintiff A (2) around November 13, 2013, the symptoms of lebane on both sides, which occurred since 6 months prior to the birth, applied to the ebrate center of the Defendant Hospital. Plaintiff A (i) was in the state of observation of ebrate increase and ebrate ebrate 7, which came into force at the outside hospital, with the ebrate ebrate 5-pleat No. 7, which came into force at the outside hospital.

3) On December 12, 2013, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital to undergo an operation on or around February 27, 2014, and sought advice on the surgery from the Defendant Hospital to undergo an operation on or around July 7, 2014, following the following day, Plaintiff A hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital to undergo an operation on or around April 27, 2014, for the purpose of the operation on or around April 7, 2014, and sought explanation on the possibility of the surgery and the surgery after the surgery. Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital for the purpose of the operation on or around April 7, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25079, Apr. 7, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 25077, Feb. 27, 2014>

5) On June 30, 2014, Plaintiff A hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital for a surgery. Plaintiff A complained of the medical personnel of Defendant Hospital that she became well aware of the bridge, and that the symptoms such as low-forestation and water surface difficulties in both ends, etc. were deepening their daily lives. Plaintiff A was unable to engage in spinal removal from the medical personnel of Defendant Hospital around July 2, 2014 (hereinafter “the first operation”).

arrow