logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2020.06.11 2020고단51
특수협박등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. Special intimidation around 03:05 on May 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim F, who was able to resisted to D from E corridor managed by D located in Heungnam-gun, Seoul, to whom he saw him; and (b) reported the two-way disease, which is a dangerous object that came out from No. 2; and (c) reported the victim as “I and I will die” to the victim; and (d) went back to the victim due to the two-way disease.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

B. On May 11, 2019, the Defendant assaulted four police officers, such as the security guards H, etc. belonging to the Kunung Police Station G District, who called to the site after receiving a report of 112 from E corridor as stated in the foregoing paragraph (a) on May 11, 2019, on the ground that he discovered the H’s course of photographing for the purpose of evidenceing the case by using a mobile phone for business purposes, intending to get off the cell phone of the said police officer, and take off the H’s cell phone.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

2. On May 11, 2019, at around 03:23, Defendant B, at around 03:23, received a report on 112 from the E corridor as stated in paragraph (1), was removed from four police officers, such as the police officer I, etc. belonging to the G District of the Heung-gu Police Station G District, and was dispatched to the site, Defendant B used Defendant B as “A police officer who knows that she will be able to turn on her frith,” and used Defendant B’s chest as his hand three times.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. The legal statement of H in the process;

1. The police statement of I and H;

1. A copy of the statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of F to police interrogation protocol copies of the police interrogation protocol, internal investigation report (Attachment to a statement of 112 reported case processing), and application of field photograph-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act for the defendant A who has the option to commit the crime;

arrow